Growth

Personal development tools for setting goals, preparing for 1:1s, and understanding peer feedback.

Last updated

Growth is your personal space for professional development. It provides tools to set and track your own objectives, prepare for manager conversations, and understand how colleagues perceive your work.

Features

My OKRs

Set personal development objectives and track progress on key results. Unlike team OKRs that align to organizational goals, individual OKRs focus on your professional growth.

See Individual OKRs for details.

1:1 Topics

Prepare for manager conversations by tracking discussion topics. Never forget what you wanted to bring up in your next 1:1.

See 1:1 Topics for details.

Peer Feedback

View aggregated feedback from colleagues across three dimensions: your impact on the team, collaboration effectiveness, and work quality.

See Feedback Reviews for details.

Practice Levels

Track your career progression within your practice (e.g., Engineering, Design, Product). Self-assess your competencies, see where you stand against level expectations, and request advancement when you're ready.

See Practice Levels for details.

How Growth Differs from Other Features

Feature Scope Purpose
Growth Individual Personal development and self-reflection
Waves Team/Organization Coordinated execution toward shared goals
360 Feedback Organization Peer assessment for performance insights

Growth is about you. It gives you agency over your development, visibility into how others see you, and tools to make manager conversations more productive.

Getting Started

  1. Set personal OKRs - Define 1-3 objectives for this quarter
  2. Add 1:1 topics - Note items to discuss with your manager
  3. Review feedback - Check how peers have rated you over time
  4. Self-assess competencies - Rate yourself on practice-specific skills

Privacy

  • Your OKRs can be set to private (only you) or shared with your manager
  • Your 1:1 topics are visible to you and your manager
  • Peer feedback shows aggregated responses without identifying individual reviewers